Eric Betzig quotes:

I was born in 1960 and can still tell you the name of every astronaut from Mercury to Apollo. If I had a chance, I'd love to go into space on one of the privately developed space crafts.

Chemistry was always my weakest subject in high school and college.

Frankly, I guess, I don't really understand why people, why so many people, are so risk averse. You know, there's always ways to wiggle your way out of any situation if you're motivated enough.

The eventual goal is to marry all of my work together to make a high-speed, high-resolution, low-impact tool that can look deep inside biological systems.

Like you can't have a car that can take the kids to schools on Friday and win the grand prix on Saturday, you can't make a microscope that can do it all.

Honestly, I feel you are poisoned if you read too much of the scientific literature because it makes you start thinking like other people. You're better off having a vague sense of what's going on and making your own way.

I really didn't like the academic structure of science, but I realized I loved science and missed science.

I'm spoiled. All of my adult jobs have left me with complete freedom to come up with what I wanted.

Science goes through fads, and there are big ups and crashes.

It takes a huge amount of effort to move from a successful high-tech prototype to broader adoption of an imaging technology.

Every new invention is like a baby. You think it may cure cancer or become the president, but in the end, you're happy it just stays out of jail.

I don't like saying 'no' to people, and I'm going to have to learn how to say 'no' more.

Sometimes I make an analogy that each scientific paper is like putting out another record. And some people have careers that are nothing but a one-hit wonder. And then there are people who are only appreciated by aficionados but largely forgotten by the wider community.

It's nice to be able to look at one protein, but life is driven by the interactions between proteins, so it's really essential to be able to see multiple proteins at a time to understand these interactions.

One thing I liked about being in microscopy is it gets you out of your box constantly because there's such a diverse range of applications.

The question was, 'Is there a way of minimizing the amount of damage you're doing so that you can then study cells in a physiological manner while also studying them at high spatial and temporal resolution for a long time?'

It always irritated me that people think they have to be locked into a career path.

In essence, we're imaging the same cell for anywhere from forty to a hundred thousand times to create one of the movies that we see.

You get so tied up with the minutiae of the day-to-day, there's never a chance to sit back and let your subconscious run wild.

In my opinion, the only real asset one has is one's reputation, right? I mean, any company and institution can go belly up at any time. But if you have a good reputation, you know, you can usually find somebody who can - who thinks they can use what you have to offer.

I missed the basic curiosity of being in the lab.

You need a continuous picture of how things are evolving, and not a slow series of snapshots where you don't know how frame A is related to frame B.

I hate driving a bandwagon.

What was shocking to us was that by spreading the energy out across seven beams instead of one, the phototoxicity went way down.