Leon Kass quotes:

Cloning looks like a degrading of parenthood and a perversion of the right relation between parents and children.

Technological innovation is indeed important to economic growth and the enhancement of human possibilities.

An enormous amount of direct advertising from pharmaceutical companies are offering a kind of instantaneous solution to problems.

Many other countries have already banned human cloning, and there are efforts at the UN to make such a ban universal.

Our only responsibility is to live our own life and take care of our own children.

Genetics is crude, but neuroscience goes directly to work on the brain, and the mind follows.

Cloning represents a very clear, powerful, and immediate example in which we are in danger of turning procreation into manufacture.

Many people recognize that technology often comes with unintended and undesirable side effects.

The benefits of biomedical progress are obvious, clear, and powerful. The hazards are much less well appreciated.

If one is seriously interested in preventing reproductive cloning, one must stop the process before it starts.

I've been opposed to human cloning from the very beginning.

Almost everybody is enthusiastic about the promise of biotechnology to cure disease and to relieve suffering.

I don't like being forced to reduce my thoughts to sound bites.

It's very hard to make arguments about the effects of cloning on family relations if family relations are in tatters.

The technological way of thinking has infected even ethics, which is supposed to be thinking about the good.

Biology, meaning the science of all life, is a late notion.

There's an ancient tension between wanting to savor the world as it is and wanting to improve on the world as given.

In cloning, in contrast, reproduction is asexual - the cloned child is the product not of two but of one.

If you have easy self-contentment, you might have a very, very cheap source of happiness.

I have nothing against respecting people who lived before, but we have no responsibility toward them.

We owe our existence to our parents, but we actually didn't have a choice.

As bad as it might be to destroy a creature made in God's image, it might be very much worse to be creating them after images of one's own.

I don't believe that efforts to prohibit only so-called reproductive cloning can be successful.

There is a lot of hype and fear about this much-talked-about prospect of designer babies.

One could look over the past century and ask oneself, has the increased longevity been good, bad or indifferent?

Sexuality itself means mortality - equally for both man and woman.

Even if certain rogue countries do things we wish nobody did, it doesn't necessarily mean that their foolishness should justify our following suit.

My job is to provide the president with the richest possible consideration, so that he knows what is at stake in whatever decision he makes.

We may simply not be wise enough to do some of the kinds of engineering things that people are talking about doing.

One should proceed with caution. We may simply not be wise enough to do some of the kinds of engineering things that people are talking about doing.

In the case of abortion, one pits the life of the fetus against the interests of the pregnant woman.

The neuroscience area - which is absolutely in its infancy - is much more important than genetics.

Human life without death would be something other than human; consciousness of mortality gives rise to out deepest longings and greatest accomplishments.

We are enmeshed in a lineage that came from somewhere and is going to make way for the next generation.

Is it possible to covet a much longer life for one's self and be as devoted to the well-being of the next generation? It's a long argument.

The technical is not just the machinery. The technical is a disposition to life.

Once you put human life in human hands, you have started on a slippery slope that knows no boundaries.

Perhaps you could sympathize with those who seek to replace a dead child with a copy, or to copy a parent or a relative or even a celebrity.

The so-called right to reproduce is not an unlimited right.

The abortion controversy is important for what it says about our stance toward procreation and children altogether.

Nobody knew in advance that in vitro fertilization would be, by and large, safe.

The human animal has evolved as a preeminently social animal.

We are somehow natured, not just to reproduce, but for sociality and even for culture.

But veteran lawmakers torn apart by PTSD don't have a choice about being Exhibit A in the case against Washington politics. When you see what can happen to a page or a junior congressman, it passes on in a very real way, not in a history-class sense, that reality of what political power really is, .. Who are we to impose this emotional albatross on public servants? As a nation, we pretend to elect our leaders. It seems unjust to make them a special class to suffer for our sins over wrongheaded laws, or pay a continuing emotional price for securing their future careers.

It's a short step from the belief that every child should be wanted to the belief that a child exists to satisfy our wants.

Shallow are the souls that have forgotten how to shudder

We know next to nothing of what we're going to know in 20 or 50 years.