Alan Kay quotes:

Most software today is very much like an Egyptian pyramid with millions of bricks piled on top of each other, with no structural integrity, but just done by brute force and thousands of slaves.

There is the desire of a consumer society to have no learning curves. This tends to result in very dumbed-down products that are easy to get started on, but are generally worthless and/or debilitating.

People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware.

Some people worry that artificial intelligence will make us feel inferior, but then, anybody in his right mind should have an inferiority complex every time he looks at a flower.

I fear -as far as I can tell- that most undergraduate degrees in computer science these days are basically Java vocational training. I've heard complaints from even mighty Stanford University with its illustrious faculty that basically the undergraduate computer science program is little more than Java certification.

I've been a Fellow in a number of companies: Xerox, Apple, Disney, HP. There are certain similarities because all the Fellows programs were derived from IBM's, which itself was derived from the MIT 'Institute Professor' program.

Scratch the surface in a typical boardroom and we're all just cavemen with briefcases, hungry for a wise person to tell us stories.

Science requires a society because even people who are trying to be good thinkers love their own thoughts and theories - much of the debugging has to be done by others.

All the companies I've worked for have this deep problem of devolving to something like the hunting and gathering cultures of 100,000 years ago. If businesses could find a way to invent 'agriculture,' we could put the world back together and all would prosper.

I fear - as far as I can tell - that most undergraduate degrees in computer science these days are basically Java vocational training.

Quite a few people have to believe something is normal before it becomes normal - a sort of 'voting' situation. But once the threshold is reached, then everyone demands to do whatever it is.

As far as Apple goes, it was a different company every few years from the time I joined in 1984.

I invented the term 'Object-Oriented', and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind.

If the pros at Sun had had a chance to fix Java, the world would be a much more pleasant place. This is not secret knowledge. It's just secret to this pop culture.

In our society we have hard nerds and soft nerds. The hard nerds are the ones who used to have the slide rules at their belt; now they have calculators. The soft nerds are the ones who get violently ill whenever anybody mentions an integral sign.

The Internet was done so well that most people think of it as a natural resource like the Pacific Ocean, rather than something that was man-made. When was the last time a technology with a scale like that was so error-free? The Web, in comparison, is a joke. The Web was done by amateurs.

Having an intelligent secretary does not get rid of the need to read, write, and draw, etc. In a well functioning world, tools and agents are complementary.

The protean nature of the computer is such that it can act like a machine or like a language to be shaped and exploited.

The best way to predict the future is to invent it.

Understanding- -like civilization, happiness, music, science and a host of other great endeavors--is not a state of being, but a manner of traveling. This great road has no final destination. The journey itself is the reward.

I had the fortune or misfortune to learn how to read fluently starting at the age of three. So I had read maybe 150 books by the time I hit 1st grade. And I already knew that the teachers were lying to me.

Sun Microsystems had the right people to make Java into a first-class language, and I believe it was the Sun marketing people who rushed the thing out before it should have gotten out.

Television should be the last mass communication medium to be naively designed and put into the world without a surgeon-general's warning.

It [the computer] is the first metamedium, and as such it has degrees of freedom for representation and expression never before encountered and as yet barely investigated

The tree of research must be fed from time to time with the blood of bean-counters, for it is its natural manure.

Basic would never have surfaced because there was always a language better than Basic for that purpose. That language was Joss, which predated Basic and was beautiful. But Basic happened to be on a GE timesharing system that was done by Dartmouth, and when GE decided to franchise that, it started spreading Basic around just because it was there, not because it had any intrinsic merits whatsoever.

I don't know how many of you have ever met Dijkstra, but you probably know that arrogance in computer science is measured in nano-Dijkstras.

The greatest single programming language ever designed

The most disastrous thing that you can ever learn is your first programming language.

The protean nature of the computer is such that it can act like a machine or like a language to be shaped and exploited

If you don't fail at least 90 percent of the time, you're not aiming high enough.

Social thinking requires very exacting thresholds to be powerful. For example, we've had social thinking for 200,000 years, and hardly anything happened that could be considered progress over most of that time. This is because what is most pervasive about social thinking is 'how to get along and mutually cope.'

Don't worry about what anybody else is going to do. The best way to predict the future is to invent it.

Perspective is worth 80 IQ points.

The future is not laid out on a track. It is something that we can decide, and to the extent that we do not violate any known laws of the universe, we can probably make it work the way that we want to.

Lisp isn't a language, it's a building material.

Any company large enough to have a research lab is too large to listen to it.

An important technology first creates a problem and then solves it.

It's easier to invent the future than to predict it.

The real romance is out ahead and yet to come. The computer revolution hasn't started yet.

The only way you can predict the future is to build it.

Technology is anything that wasn't around when you were born.

Java and C++ make you think that the new ideas are like the old ones. Java is the most distressing thing to hit computing since MS-DOS.

Change is easy, except for the changed part.

The flip side of the coin was that even good programmers and language designers tended to do terrible extensions when they were in the heat of programming, because design is something that is best done slowly and carefully.

Possibly the only real object-oriented system in working order. (About Internet

A change in perspective is worth 80 IQ points. Perspective is worth 80 IQ points. Point of view is worth 80 IQ points

[ Computing ] is just a fabulous place for that, because it's a place where you don't have to be a Ph.D. or anything else. It's a place where you can still be an artisan. People are willing to pay you if you're any good at all, and you have plenty of time for screwing around.

In success there's a tendency to keep on doing what you were doing.

The computer is simply an instrument whose music is ideas.

I hired finishers because I'm a good starter and a poor finisher.

Technology is anything invented after you were born, everything else is just stuff.

A computer scientist is a machine for converting coffee into urine.

Any medium powerful enough to extend man's reach is powerful enough to topple his world.

To get the medium's magic to work for one's aims rather than against them is to attain literacy.

Humans are communications junkies. We just can't get enough.

It's all about long-term, sustaining relationships,

Computer literacy is a contact with the activity of computing deep enough to make the computational equivalent of reading and writing fluent and enjoyable. As in all the arts, a romance with the material must be well under way. If we value the lifelong learning of arts and letters as a springboard for personal and societal growth, should any less effort be spent to make computing a part of our lives?

We cannot predict the future, but we can invent it.

By the time I got to school, I had already read a couple hundred books. I knew in the first grade that they were lying to me because I had already been exposed to other points of view. School is basically about one point of view -- the one the teacher has or the textbooks have. They don't like the idea of having different points of view, so it was a battle. Of course I would pipe up with my five-year-old voice.

Perl is another example of filling a tiny, short-term need, and then being a real problem in the longer term.

Simple things should be simple and complex things should be possible.

When the Mac first came out, Newsweek asked me what I [thought] of it. I said: Well, it's the first personal computer worth criticizing. So at the end of the presentation, Steve came up to me and said: Is the iPhone worth criticizing? And I said: Make the screen five inches by eight inches, and you'll rule the world.

The biggest problem we have as human beings is that we confuse our beliefs with reality.

Every technology really needs to be shipped with a special manual - not how to use it but why, when and for what.

If you're not failing 90% of the time, then you're probably not working on sufficiently challenging problems.

A new friend is new wine, when it grows old, you will enjoy drinking it.

When I first prepared this particular talk... I realized that my usual approach is usually critical. That is, a lot of the things that I do, that most people do, are because they hate something somebody else has done, or they hate that something hasn't been done. And I realized that informed criticism has completely been done in by the web. Because the web has produced so much uninformed criticism. It's kind of a Gresham's Law-bad money drives the good money out of circulation. Bad criticism drives good criticism out of circulation. You just can't criticize anything.

Yazılım konusunda iddialı insanlar kendi donanımlarını yapmalılar.

Knowledge is silver. Outlook is gold. IQ is a lead weight.

In computers, every 'new explosion' was set off by a software product that allowed users to program differently.

If you're utopian, you're never satisfied.

The result is - document destruction - we're really not going to be able to prove beyond a truth the negatives and some of the positive conclusions that we're going to come to. There will be always unresolved ambiguity here.

Bad User on Device is a medium that can dynamically simulate the details of any other medium, including media that cannot exist physically. It is not a tool, although it can act like many tools. It is the first metamedium, and as such it has degrees of freedom for representation and expression never before encountered and as yet barely investigated.

Artificial intelligence is what we don't know how to do yet

School is basically about one point of view - the one the teacher has or the textbooks have. They don't like the idea of having different points of view,...

The idea that hardware on networks should just be caches for movable process descriptions and the processes themselves goes back quite a ways. There's a real sense in which MS and Apple never understood networking or operating systems (or what objects really are), and when they decided to beef up their OSs, they went to (different) very old bad mainframe models of OS design to try to adapt to personal computers.